Changes between Version 52 and Version 53 of SOPs/chip_seq_peaks


Ignore:
Timestamp:
08/06/20 10:50:01 (4 years ago)
Author:
byuan
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • SOPs/chip_seq_peaks

    v52 v53  
    66 * Call peaks (eg. MACS) or use another method to analyze enrichment and/or presumed binding.  For ChIP-seq experiments profiling transcription factors (with discrete binding sites), binding site identification (via peak calling) is typically recommended.  Peaks can be called without control; however, it's highly recommended to include a control sample (e.g. IgG or input, with input generally preferred over IgG).  For ChIP-seq experiments profiling epigenetic (such as histone) modifications, however, modeling ChIP enrichment as peaks may not accurately describe the actual data, and some other (such as sliding window) quantification may be more relevant.
    77 * Note that quality control is important after read mapping and after peak calling.  The ENCODE consortium recommends some [[https://genome.ucsc.edu/ENCODE/qualityMetrics.html|quality metrics]].
     8
     9* [[http://barc.wi.mit.edu/education/hot_topics/ChIPseq_2018/ChIPseq_2018.commands.txt|Basic commands can be found in our Hot Topics workshop]]. You need to change it based on your experiment as mentioned below.
    810
    911=== Reviews ===