Changes between Version 58 and Version 59 of SOPs/rna-seq-diff-expressions


Ignore:
Timestamp:
10/16/18 09:35:51 (6 years ago)
Author:
gbell
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • SOPs/rna-seq-diff-expressions

    v58 v59  
    2929  * **Quantification of raw counts**
    3030
     31    * Is your sequencing library stranded or unstranded?  This information is needed to help these tools accurately count features.  Strandedness of some library prep methods:
     32      * "TruSeqStrandedPolyA" reads are stranded in the reverse direction (relative to the transcript orientation).
     33      * "SMARTerUltra-lowPOLYA-V4" reads are unstranded.
     34    * See [[SAMBAMqc]] (and/or look at mapped reads in a genome browser) to determine or verify strandedness
     35
    3136    * Currently our favorite tool for this is [[http://bioinf.wehi.edu.au/featureCounts/|featureCounts]], part of the [[http://subread.sourceforge.net/|Subread]] package.
    3237      * featureCounts is much faster than htseq-count, but the details of its counting method is quite different from that of htseq-count, especially for paired-end reads
     
    5358    * [[http://www-huber.embl.de/users/anders/HTSeq/doc/count.html|htseq-count]] works fine to get counts for each gene, but it's quite slow.
    5459      * Include same GTF file describing gene models as was used for mapping -- but think carefully about what genes should be included (such as long non-coding RNAs, microRNAs, or piRNAs)
    55       * Is your sequencing library stranded or unstranded?  This information is needed to help htseq-count accurately count features.  If the library prep method is "TruSeqStrandedPolyA", for example, the reads will be stranded in the reverse direction (relative to the transcript orientation).
    56         * See [[SAMBAMqc]] to determine strandedness
    5760      * Carefully choose the best "mode" to handle reads that don't completely map to exactly one gene.
    5861      * Counting can be also performed transcript level but this may be too much information.